Which war is the most important one to win? The one on drugs, the one on terrorism, or neither?
« George Will on School Choice | Main | The Costs of Border Control »
February 02, 2007
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Recent Posts
- New Blog Site: Libertarianism, from A to Z
- Primum Non Nocere: A Libertarian Stimulus Package
- No "Feel Good" Rhetoric Left Behind
- The Right to Bear Arms
- Government Efforts to Stop Doping in Sports
- Prosecuting Prostitution
- Opium Wars
- The Consequences of Prohibiting Immigration
- Clear-Headed Thinking on Iraq
- Should Africa Fix Itself?
August 2009
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 |
Links
The war on drugs, apparently...
As much as the Taliban has resurged in the guise of a Muslim FARC, have you looked at Mexico at all? While Alvaro Uribe and the US have trumpeted coca eradication and falling crime in Colombia, the cartels have simply moved. Mexico has gone to hell in a handbasket under the radar.
Posted by: Alex Forshaw | February 02, 2007 at 11:23 AM
Neither. And they're not even wars. They're just violent ideologies for bed-wetting pansies.
Posted by: HarmoniousJosh | February 03, 2007 at 07:32 PM
Very informative post about Drugs and Terrorism in Afghanistan! Keep the nice job. We would love to see more.
Posted by: buy viagra | January 12, 2010 at 05:33 PM
I agree, those are interesting points. This task is meant to help Afghanistan repress the worrisome, if predictable, expansion of its opium economy, it will greatly hamper NATO's effectiveness.THx,
Posted by: supra schoenen | September 24, 2011 at 03:23 AM